1.
1.
In her article Ostrom (2009) gives a general framework that is used to identify ten
subsystems that affect the likelihood of self-organization in efforts to
achieve a sustainable social ecological system (Ostrom, 2009: 419). The
framework consists of four first-level core subsystems: resource systems,
resource units, governance system and users. Each of these core subsystems is
made up of multiple second-level variables. There are several variables to be
found in the article and the choice of variables depends on the particular
questions under study, the type of SES, and the spatial and temporal scales of
analysis (Ostrom, 2009: 420).
Resource system
The resource system here is the one of honey
production in Europe. As honey is produced by bees, the sector (RS1) is
beekeeping. However, as bees are also responsible for pollinating 84% of the
agriculture in Europe, one could argue that the sector consists of more than
just one sector (European Commission, 2014). This brings us to the following
variable: size of resource system (RS3). The size of the resource system of
honey production alone is not too big. The big players are the beekeepers who
take care of the bees and are responsible for the production of the honey. When
looking at the land the beekeepers use, it can be concluded again that this is
not a lot. For example, in the Netherlands there are 7000 beekeepers
(Telegraaf, 2014). Taking all of this into account, it can be concluded that
bee keeping is small scaled.
Resource units
The resource units in this case are the bees. When
looking at the growth rate or replacement rate (RU3), it can be stated that the
growth is decreasing. One cause can be found in the use of pesticides and
illnesses. Although there was a growth of 7.1% between 2005-2010 in 22
countries of EU, many countries have seen a decrease of bees (Nieuws, 2014).
Another source mentioned a loss of 20% of the population of bees over the last
five years (Telegraaf, 2014). This causes big problems as bees are connected to
the growing interest and need of biofuels made out of rape, sunflowers and
soybeans. These are all plants that need pollination. That is also why the EU
came with regulation prohibiting pesticides and tried to increase the
population of the bees again (Nieuws, 2014). The economic value (RU4) is therefore
big as bees do not only produce honey, but have a large interest in agriculture
and biofuels.
Governance systems
As stated earlier one of the government organizations
(GS1) is the European Union. They have regulations and measures concerning the
protection of Europe’s bees. Furthermore, they also have regulations concerning
the labeling of honey. For example, information about the honey, country of
origin, weight, product code and shelf life needs to be provided (Imkersleiden,
2014). In this sector, there are also nongovernment organizations (GS2) active.
Some are for example the unions for beekeepers. The Dutch bee union for example
has the mission to create optimal conditions for beekeepers so that they can
keep bees in a professional way (Bijenhouders, 2014). Others are the stores
that sell the honey, or organizations that process them or use honey in their
products. The monitoring and sanctioning processes (GS8) are the task of the
countries that are part of the European Union as they have to implement and
monitor the regulations.
Users
The number of users (U1) depends on the amount of
people who eat honey and all of the products involving honey. The size of the
group is relevant as the bee production could decrease or disappear altogether in the worst case when people stop eating honey and
honey products. Knowledge of the resource (U7) can either destroy or improve
the sustainability of a resource. In this case, the actors that are involved
are aware of the shrinking bee population. The importance of resource to users
(U8) can also improve or destroy sustainability. In successful cases of
self-organization, users are either dependent on the resource for a substantial
portion of their livelihoods or attach high value to the sustainability of the
resource. Otherwise, the costs of organizing and maintaining a self-governing
system may not be worth the effort (Ostrom, 2009: 421). As eating honey or
honey products usually is not a matter of survival, the likelihood of
self-governing is not that big.
Conclusion
The resource system seems to be small and also the
population of bees is shrinking. When analyzing these two variables, the
chances on self-organization seem to be big. However, when looking at the
governmental and users variables, it seems small as the users are not that dependant on honey. So are the
chances of self-organization in the bee production big or small? When taken
into account the effect that the bees have, not only in producing honey, but
also the other agriculture and biofuels systems, it is clear that there is a
need of governmental system which is actually also the case. Regulations are needed
that improve the amount of bees which have an effect that can be measured on
several levels.
Bibliography
·
Bijenhouders.
Missie en doel. [http://www.bijenhouders.nl/over-de-nbv/missie-en-doel].
8 October 2014.
·
European
Commission. Beekeeping, honey production
and wild bees.
[http://ec.europa.eu/food/archive/animal/liveanimals/bees/index_en.htm]. 8
October 2014.
·
Imkersleiden.
Regels voor etikettering van honing.
[http://www.imkersleiden.nl/index.php/vereniging/24-etikettering]. 8 October
2014.
·
Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing
the sustainability of social-ecological systems, Science 325, 419-422.
·
Nieuws.
Bijentekort Europa door meer
biobrandstof. [http://www.nieuws.nl/algemeen/20140109/Bijentekort-Europa-door-meer-biobrandstof].
8 October 2014.
·
Telegraaf.
Imker vreest doodsteek door strenge EU
regels.
[http://www.telegraaf.nl/feed/krant/krant_financieel/21766248/__Imker_vreest_doodsteek_door_strenge_EU-regels__.html].
8 October 2014.
2.
2.
In the previous post it was concluded that Friedman
argues that businesses should focus on business and that social responsibility
is a matter of the government. Social responsibility is comparable to
sustainable management of social ecology systems. It therefore does not seem
logical that the principle of Friedman can be used in a constructive way to
manage a SES. However, as the framework of Ostrom (2009) showed, resources are
very important in a system. When these resources become scarce, it is very hard
or even impossible for a business to make profits. In order to keep making
profits, it can be crucial for a business to be sustainable.
You gave a very clear analysis of a bee-honey system by using Ostrom’s framework. Especially the part of resource units, you gave GS1, GS2 and GS8 with explanation and examples, helps me to understand this system and the framework a lot. And for the part of users, I think you also gave a very good comment of ' eating honey is not a matter of survival' which evaluates the whole case from a different perspective.
BeantwoordenVerwijderenAnd for the second part, you made it precise and caught the point. To a certain extent I agree with you that if resources become scarce, it is very hard or even impossible for a business to make profits. But there are still companies and firms that not heavily based on resources, right? I think you could give a further illustration of if sustainability is also crucial for this kind of business.
Nice that you start with a brief explanation of the SES framework.
BeantwoordenVerwijderenOne suggestion about your honey production in Europe. The sector you are discussing is bee-keeping, and the size of the system is the number of beekeepers according to your resource system paragraph. However, when you talk about the resource units (bees), you state that an important mechanism for the decline of the bee population is the use of pesticides. This is very true, I think, but this does not apply to the bees of the beekeepers, who hold the bees near their own flower patches. Therefore I believe that you are talking about to different resource sectors and sizes in the resource system and the resource unit paragraph.